Tags: play chess online, chess online, play chess, play chess online, chess, play chess online, sudoku
Chess Forum mailcafe.net << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | Posted by i_play_slowly mailcafe.net
1/05/2006 22:07:08 Play online chess | Subject: Curious strategy
Message: Could someone please offer a rationale for the following principle?
*
"Don't pin the opponent's King's Knight to the Queen before the opponent has castled."
*
Grateful to all who reply,
*
i_play_slowly
| Posted by ccmcacollister mailcafe.net
1/05/2006 23:33:41 Play online chess | okay
Message: Suppose WT plays Bg5 doing that. If BL then plays h6, and g5 prn, then he incurrs little consequence for doing it, if he is not o-o there yet. (Indeed if WT is o-o and BL is not or is o-o-o, then WT may have actually helped to initiate a pawn storm vs his own K-side by playing Bg5 early.) Whereas if BL IS o-o there then he has weakened his Kings field if he plays h6 aor g5. AND created targets there.
More consequential.
Granted it's a generality and there are other ways of breaking or neutralizing a pin.
And there are cases where it is fine to make such a pin without ...o-o , EG French Defense it can be made so as to get Be7 by BL so that WT e5 push can be made to trade-off the dark Bishops ... of which BL had the slightly better of the two. Just one example.
I agree with you tho, i_play_slowly , that it is valuable to question the axioms of play. After knowing axioms, then Discovering the Exceptions to those axioms that others play by, is part of what elevates a player to mastery imo. (I mentioned sometime back 2 reasons for decisive games. A-execution and B-extra knowlege).
***
[BTW , In relation to the topic of weakening pawn moves... There is another generality that says Do Not move Pawns on the side where you are under attack. Once you do so, you have created a weakness that Can be exploited if you assume indefinate material and time resources to the opponent.
So the strategic justifications for doing so would be (a) to slow opp's attack there (if yours is raging at some other area:) or (b) to seal the pawn structure there. Otherwise such things can (and should) come to haunt you. ]
| Posted by i_play_slowly mailcafe.net
1/07/2006 01:43:18 Play online chess | Clearly explained
Message: Thanks!
|
Chess news:
Kamsky Wins United States Chess Champion -- It took almost 20 years, but Gata Kamsky is once again the United States Chess Champion. Kamsky won the title on Tuesday by drawing a one-game playoff against Yuri Shulman. Kamsky, who had Black, had draw odds, meaning that he only had to draw the game to be declared winner on tie-break. Though Kamsky has been one of the top chess players in the world since the early 1990’s, he had only won the U.S. Chess Championship once before — in 1991, when he was 17. Part of the reason for the long hiatus was that he almost completely quit playing chess between 1996 and 2004, a period in which he went to school and got a law degree. The playoff for the chess championship had ...
The Catalan chess opening part 1: how does White avert this crisis? -- The classic chess opening served Anand well in his chess world championship matches. But how best to exploit its strengths? The Catalan opening gave Anand two wins in the world chess championship, and has long been popular among the world's elite. It is basically a Queen's Gambit in which White fianchettos. It can be reached via several different move orders, for example: 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 Nf6 4 g3, or 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 g3 d5 4 Bg2. The bishop is tricky on the long diagonal, and the fianchetto provides a safe king position after castling. RB I've always tended to get the Catalan confused with the Bogo-Indian, various Benoni systems, and even ...
Gata Kamsky wins U.S. Chess Championship -- Gata Kamsky of New York won the U.S. Chess Championship on Tuesday in St. Louis. In an odd finish to the 24-player event, Kamsky drew to break a tie with Yury Shulman of Chicago. The chess tournament began with seven conventional rounds. Then top scorers Kamsky, Shulman, Alexander Onischuk (Baltimore) and 2009 chess champion Hikaru Nakamura (St. Louis) qualified for a round robin to determine the top four places. Kamsky and Shulman scored 2-1, while Nakamura and Onischuk tied for third at 1-2. In the game that decided the title of chess champion and the $30,000 first prize, Kamsky chose to play Black with draw odds and 25 minutes against Shulman's 60 minutes. Shulman gained ...
|
|