Play chess online, board games, free chess online, chess teams, chess puzzles, chess games database, free online chess games, chess clubs, chess league, chess games, online games and more...

Tags: chess, play chess, free chess, chess online, free chess, online chess

Chess Forum
mailcafe.net << - < - > - >>

From	Message
Posted by aandersen mailcafe.net 3/31/2008 05:33:10 play online chess	Subject: Help ! (with openings) Message: I’m trying to learn something about opening theory. The idea being that with a bit more knowledge, I might have some idea about where the game is going rather than being bounced around by circumstances as I seem to do now. So, I bought a book and started reading it but I’m stuck on chapter 1 verse 1. I’m looking at something called the C3 sicillian. I’m fine with the first moves (e4 c5) but then we come to C3. The author seems to set great store by this move without really explaining what is so good about it. I’m no expert (and possibly this is why I’m not getting it) but to me the move seems boring, pointless and almost gives the initiative to black at this early stage. Can anyone out there help me with this one? Yours sincerely Confused from London
Posted by lighttotheright mailcafe.net 3/31/2008 07:39:05 play online chess	Message: The c3 variation is OK; but from your description, it sounds like the author may have over-hyped it. I cannot be sure of what the author stated about it, since I only have your perception from your post. To understand the move, you must understand the motive behind it. The opening is a struggle to force the play into lines that you feel comfortable playing instead of your opponent. Presumably, e4 is played because it is considered the strongest first move by many. This can sometimes be true regardless whether you like a tactical or positional style game. 1. e4 usually turns into a tactical game. 1. ... c5 turns that tactical game into one that is non-symmetrical. 2. c3 turns the game back into a more positional one. Many people don't quite understand positional play. When Black played 1. ... c5 he was not likely to have wanted to play a positional game. So, 2. c3 is good in that it goes directly against much of the intent of Black's first move. It supports a possible d4 advance, which is good in the struggle for the control of the center. You stated that c3 seems to be a wasted move; yet, the normal line with Nf3 can be considered just as wasted because the knight will be soon forced into an early second move. So, the main difference is whether you want a slug-fest or a dance. A lot of people cannot dance, so they prefer to slug it out in a tactical game. And then there are those people that consider 'boxing' as a form of dance. It can get confusing. Most people play e4 because they want tactical play. It just seems strange to some that white would abruptly change the presumptive character of the game like that. Despite this, 2. c3 is fine. It is just unusual.
Posted by schnarre mailcafe.net 3/31/2008 09:11:18 play online chess	Hmmnnnnn Message: The move 2. c3 essentially forces direct confrontation by preparing a later d4 to force Black into exchanges (e.g., 2. c3 Nc6, 3.d4 cxd4, 4. cxd4--here White has the center squares), or to supplement other moves (e.g, 2. c3 Nc6, 3.Nf3 d6, 4.d4 cxd4, 5. cxd4 Bg4, 6. Bb5). To put it simply, it's the "I'm going to grind you down!" move.
Posted by marinvukusic mailcafe.net 3/31/2008 10:07:19 play online chess	... Message: "The author seems to set great store by this move without really explaining what is so good about it." Exact quote would be nice. In any case this is a good opening and I would recommend putting the effort in at least first 10 pages or so (maybe author's position will become clearer from his comments).
Posted by aandersen mailcafe.net 3/31/2008 12:01:07 play online chess	Message: Thank you folks for your responses. I have decided that i will carry on reading and also when i've finished some of my current crop of games, i will try to find some games where i can experiment with this. I think that pehaps some practical experience will help me to understand. Once again, thank you all.
Posted by schnarre mailcafe.net 4/03/2008 15:00:13 play online chess	Message: Glad we could help mate! Good luck, & good hunting!
Posted by wschmidt mailcafe.net 4/08/2008 11:55:52 play online chess	My two-bits... Message: get a book or look at a website that focuses on good opening principles rather than trying to learn the nuances of a particular line at first. There are several good books out there that talk about controling the center, piece development and pawn structure. That stuff is way more important to learn than specific lines at the 1200-1500 level.
Posted by ionadowman mailcafe.net 4/08/2008 13:23:10 play online chess	Also ... Message: ... find a database that features games with this opening. Play through wins and losses (and draws). It's not a bad idea for the first few games at least just to play them through without thinking too deeply into the lines, but observing how the game shapes, and look out for motifs (tactical or strategic) that seem to recur in several games. Does the pawn structure seem pretty much the same in most games? (Yes or no). If so, what's the upshot? If not, is it because emphasis is on some other aspect of the game e.g. piece play or direct attacks on the king, say. Cheers, Ion
Chess news: Telegraph chess: Tsk, tsk, Tomsk -- Last week I wondered how Tomsk 400, a chess team composed almost exclusively of world class players could be performing so badly at the Russian Team Chess Championships recently concluded at Dagomys in the Black Sea resort of Sochi. The chess tournament was won by Ural of Ekaterinburg. It has emerged that Tomsk, who are former European Team champions were fined 1000 roubles by the chess tournament organisers for what was described as a “breach of sporting discipline”. In Soviet times there were coded phrases for a variety of transgressions and this particular one often referred to drunkenness which is a rather compelling explanation as the fine was levied the morning after the rest day. What’s more, as reported last week, Tomsk 400 scored just a half point out ... Telegraph chess: Pole is poles apart -- The former world chess champion Piotr Murdzia of Poland outperformed the finest line up of British solvers ever assembled at the Final of the 2007-2008 Winton Capital British Chess Solving Championship held at Oakham School on 16th February. Murdzia led throughout and won by a big margin. Thirty three solvers took part, including for the first time, all six titled British solvers. The British title was expected to be a duel between the defending champion and reigning World Champion John Nunn and Jonathan Mestel, himself a former World Chess Champion. Nunn had a disastrous second round, dropping 6 of the 10 points on the mates in 3, which left him in 7th place overall, 6 points behind Mestel. A determined fight back fell just short and Mestel took the title by half ... Chess by Larry Evans -- Chess was popular in Italy by the 16th century, and Italian chess players were regarded as the best in the world. But Ruy Lopez, a Spanish priest, defeated them on his visit to Rome on ecclesiastical business connected with the election of Pope Pius IV in 1560. A year later, his book, Libro de la invencion liberal y arte del juego del Axedrez, consisted of 95 instructive chapters. He made the first great contribution to chess ethics by advising us to place the board with the sun shining in our opponent's eyes. The opening, named after Ruy Lopez, (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5) is today a dreaded weapon in White's arsenal. Last year, a long-lost manuscript with chess diagrams possibly drawn by Leonardo da Vinci was discovered among thousands of volumes in a private ...