Chess Forum
mailcafe.net << - < - > - >>
| From | Message |
| Posted by aixrad mailcafe.net 9/05/2008 05:18:31 play online chess |  Subject: Checkmate or notMessage: I recently played with black this game  game with pianofred.
In this Position I generated the conditional move 20 Rf2 Re1+ ... with threefold repetition to save the draw because I had less material. pianofred mean I maybe could checkmate him forces but we both don't know how. Is this a forced checkmate position? Was it right to save the draw with threefold repetition? Greetings Ralf |
| Posted by beefturnmail mailcafe.net 9/05/2008 05:49:19 play online chess | Message: |
| Posted by aixrad mailcafe.net 9/05/2008 06:36:33 play online chess | Message: Then I wa very stupd and blind at that moment |
| Posted by chessnovice mailcafe.net 9/05/2008 21:39:08 play online chess | put a positive spin on it Message: |
| Posted by ionadowman mailcafe.net 9/07/2008 13:55:23 play online chess | Incidentally... Message: Bad luck, Ion |
| Posted by wuzzie mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 04:13:47 play online chess | not checkmate Message: |
| Posted by lighttotheright mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 11:59:11 play online chess | Message: Aixrad, you did well to accept a draw in this position. After wuzzie's 20. Qg4+ Qxg4 21. fxg4...Rxb2 22. Nd2 would have left White with a possible decisive advantage. Although Black would have 2 passed pawns, the vertical isolation would have been difficult to defend. White would have opportunities to open his own passed pawns along the King-side once the black h pawn fell. And don't forget that White would still have an extra piece to fight in this position. Black cannot defend everything under best play. |
| Posted by heinzkat mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 12:04:46 play online chess | Message: Should Black play 23. ... Re2, taking the draw because of threefold repetition, or should Black play 23. ... Qxf1#/Rxf1#, taking the win because of checkmate. You cannot say that Black did well to take the draw in this position !?!?!??? |
| Posted by lighttotheright mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 12:18:58 play online chess | Message: It depends upon what position you are talking about. That is the danger of talking about this game or any like it. If you analyse a different position, you can get entirely different conclusions. |
| Posted by tugger mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 15:27:10 play online chess | Message: For reference, White should have played 20. Qg4+ and he probably wins, forcing the Queens off the board with a pawn advantage (just the one pawn, as b2 is vulnerable to capture from the Rook). Better still would be to develop the Knight as opposed greedily snatching the pawn on move 19. |
| Posted by tugger mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 15:33:07 play online chess | Message: The position in the first post is not a win for Black, as it is White to move, and he can save with Qg4+. It is only after White plays Rf2 that it becomes a win for Black. But I would still say that a draw for Black after missing a mate in one can not be considered a good result. |
| Posted by lighttotheright mailcafe.net 9/11/2008 22:11:00 play online chess | Message: Then White made a mistake and Black did not take advantage of it. That's compounding mistakes. Both sides clearly intended the draw by repeating the position shown by aixrad on move 20. It did not matter that the repeating sequence was flawed. Neither player could see that flaw. Aixrad asked about the exact position he displayed in the first post. I merely confirmed wuzzie's analysis of that exact position. This game was a draw by repetition not by an accepted draw on move 20. It lasted longer than that (I knew that all along). The presumptive acceptance of a draw on move 20 was what I commented on...not the mistakes made later. The line of play I gave as example proves what I was talking about. To later criticize me for stating something I didn't is ludicrous. No where did I refute any of the previous analysis given by others that show the forced mates. But those forced mates do not materialize until after White's Rf2. |
| Posted by tugger mailcafe.net 9/12/2008 08:20:12 play online chess | Message: "Aixrad, you did well to accept a draw in this position." is what i consider ludicrous. it's my opinion that aixrad should be disappointed, not pleased. i don't mean to pan him down, it's intended as constructive critisism. one should never be pleased about missing an easy win. aixrad should be looking to improve his game to the point where he can spot mate in one positions, and that means he should be disappointed when he misses them. this will hopefully drive him forward, trying to ensure he does not feel this disappointment again. i do know what lighttotheright is saying, though. in the position at the very top of this thread, aixrad is worse off positionally and materially. so i understand why he is saying a draw was not bad. perhaps a better way of approaching this problem is to directly answer the questions aixrad asks... "Is this a forced checkmate position?" - Not in this position. "Was it right to save the draw with threefold repetition?" - No, you should've waited to see what White's reply to Re2 was, then analysed the position, instead of putting up conditional moves. Perhaps then you might have found the win. |
| Posted by lighttotheright mailcafe.net 9/12/2008 11:15:05 play online chess | Message: But I would like to point out that aizrad is only a 1300 level player. We shouldn't expect a 1600 to 1700 level or greater performance out of him. Is a draw the best result? Of course not. But don't forget that a draw is still a good result regardless. Certainly, it is a lot better than a loss. |
| Posted by tugger mailcafe.net 9/13/2008 07:41:06 play online chess | Message: "But I would like to point out that aizrad is only a 1300 level player. We shouldn't expect a 1600 to 1700 level or greater performance out of him. " before i go on, i stress again it's just my opinion, but i really don't think that spotting that mate is 1600+ standard, in fact i would expect a 1300 player to have no trouble winning after Rf2. this is precisely the reason aixrad should be disappointed. if he's not disappointed, then how can he drive himself on to improve? if instead he shrugs his shoulders and says "well, a draw is a good result here", then i don't see him breaking into the 1600+ class. but maybe that's just the way i approach things. i guess he may see things differently. he may be boosted by the fact he didn't lose, and as such have more confidence. but i know i would be disappointed if i missed that. it's ironic really, as during the threefold repetition, both players took it in turns to blunder away a win! |
Chess news: Battery unpowered -- Ring ring knock over your king, that’s the rule nowadays in chess. If a mobile phone sounds the owner loses immediately and it was Nigel Short’s turn to be a victim of this when his phone sounded during his game against former British Ladies Chess Champion Ketevan Arakhamia-Grant in the second round of the EU Chess Championship underway at Liverpool’s World Museum. Short had recently changed his phone and had switched it off but was undone when the device ran low on power and gave out a fatal warning. There was another telephonic tragedy a few days ago in round six of the Russian High Chess League as Vladimir Malakhov the number one seed was defaulted in ... Topalov's late show -- Another storming finish from Veselin Topalov secured the 150,000 Euro first prize in the inaugural Grand Slam Final at Bilbao. In the tenth and final round Topalov overcome Vasily Ivanchuk with some dynamic play from a position many chess players would have given up as drawn. The three points for a win and one for a draw scoring system ensured Topalov’s two wins in his last three games propelled him into first place. There was another bonus for the former FIDE chess champion as he moved to number one on the unofficial live rating list. I was able to witness the innovative arrangements first hand at the Plaza de Nuevo which hosted a unique chess festival for ... Adams shares the lead -- England chess number one Michael Adams and David Howell are both on the leading score of 5/6 with four to play of at the EU Chess Championship being hosted by the Liverpool World Museum. Adams outplayed the Latvian GM Normunds Miezis while Howell won rapidly against Danny Gormally who had been in superb form having held the French Super GM Etienne Bacrot to a draw with black and then defeating former WCC Candidate Alexander Belyavsky in a fine game. Nigel Short’s woes continued as he lost to IM Lorin D’Costa of Hertford in the fifth round and he is still off the pace. The chess tournament must be the strongest Open event ever held in the UK with six of the world’s top 100 chess ... | |